Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate. Answer: Introduction: Equality is one of the aspects that need to be observed at all time. The world since time immemorial has been seen to act for men more than the opposite gender. That is, there has been a lot of under presentation of women most specifically in the Technology, Science, Medicine, Engineering and Mathematics subject-based careers. This kind of imbalance does not necessarily mean that men are better than women but just a way of humiliating their female counterparts in an attempt to promote gender inequality. In fact, most of the nations are behaving in a manner to suggest that the world is going backward to adopt the colonial nature of several states which did not recognize the presence of women in making concrete decision. Conversely, the world is changing, and everything seems to take a different direction as far as equality is concerned. That is, women and men have been provided with similar capabilities that are key determiners of fair and observed gender balance. In school, both boys and girls equally take the same subjects in science, technology, and mathematics yet in the workplaces; men become the dominant elements. All in all, under presentation of women, continues to prevail. Therefore it becomes essential to critically analyze the key factor for under presentation of women to deeply understand the subject. The under presentation of women can be explained the stereotype that boys are better than girls. Often in almost all the learning institutions, there is the notion that no way females can outdo in studying the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (Hill, Corbett, and Rose, 2010, 38). This belief is further supported by the parents who are seen to offer support to their children on gender-based subjects whereby girls dominate the language issues. Such notion by far kills the morale and interferes with the progress of the girls as far as overall subjects are concerned. By supporting that stereotype implies or directly communicates to the girl on how weak they are to undertake STEMM. The fact that men are naturally overrated more than females explains why ladies are not willing to major in the STEMM areas (Hyde, Lindberg, Linn, Ellis, and Williams, 2008, 495). Consequently, the males continue dominating the STEMM demanding work environments at ease while only a small number o f women prevail. Undertaking self-evaluation by ladies means that the ability to achieve equal performance is undermined. Girls in most cases perform a self assessment test and put themselves to standards lower than that of males. Past research reveals that when a lady is in the class, they make generalizations that emanate from self-evaluation which dictate that STEMM is for the boys and that girls should not attempt them (Hill et al., 2010, 42). This extends to a point where even when the lady excels in STEMM subject, she cannot believe in herself or gather the self motivation to perform even better but they end up feeling insecure for tampering with boys items. Gender bias discourages women from pursuing the STEMM subjects. They are associated with the cultural arts subjects and STEMM subjects directly associated with the males. Women naturally are known to portray a moderate level of competence in the in an execution of masculine jobs (Clark, 2005, 370). The first belief at this point is that if women happen to participate in the masculinity demanding jobs, they end up being unlikable. For instance, it is not right to count on a lady to fix electricity problem as men do. Therefore, due to such negative motive towards women, they are humbled to the ground and are not at any given time willing to express their interests on STEMM subject an attempt to maintain the acceptability. According to the previous research, many ladies tend to undertake STEMM subjects all the way from secondary to tertiary levels, but only a few of them retain these items up to graduation. The academic studies are that it is possible to internalize the subjects at the lower educational levels but difficult to continue with such a trend at higher levels (Ceci, Williams and Barnett, 2009, 218). This is because at the university level, learning is complex and natural selection is bound to take place at that time. Little past success cannot serve as the prerequisite for excellence at higher levels. Consequently, men are harder than women, therefore, recording a high turn up during the graduation. Further research done at Harvard University suggests that STEMM department offers ladies less career satisfaction than men. The contribution of lecturers and professors in supporting more career paths for males in fields of science, engineering, technology, and mathematics lead to the loss of cre ativity to females (Ceci, and Williams, 2011, 3159). This extends the gap for under presentation of women in the workplace and other fields where spatially related skills are on demand. The difference in excelling in science, technology, and other related subjects are closely related to normal variation specifically during the gestation period. At this time boys are bound to take advantage of favorable hormonal selection that enables them to strengthen their cognitive abilities more than the girls. As the males grow, they slowly adopt t o the environment, and as they learn, a sense of responsibility is developed (Stout, Dasgupta, Hunsinger, and McManus, 2011, 255). This implies that natural brain sharpness may be lacking but can be adopted as the child attains the age necessary to define her as the major player in the society. On the other hand, women are in some way advantaged due to the notion that after all they will be married and resources for upkeep and nurturing the children are provided by the man. Having such a clear picture of life in mind, a man is bound to work hard and ensure that all concepts of learning are understood. Many women and girls show little or no interest in the STEMM subjects. Researchers carried out to get the explanation of that point by the Society for American quality suggest that females are not interested in the technical matters (Beede et al., 2011, 64). The working environments for STEMM-oriented employees are critical, and there is need to develop interconnection of ideas and skills to have a given task done. Ladies tend to be overshadowed by the jobs that require cleanliness and smartness. Conversely, even if a particular woman achieves in mathematics and other sciences, she ends up majoring in areas such as literature, history, political science and several simple fields (Hewlett, 2008, 213). The gender difference serves a significant purpose in gauging the self-confidence of the individuals who are willing to undertake the STEMM Subjects. According to the past research, there is little confidence in women to take the science, technology, engineering and other related topics as compared to men who comfortably indicate a high level of self-esteem. Self-belief in those subjects is greater at lower levels of schooling and reduces as the individuals approach the higher educational levels where their experience on the subject is not recognized (Xie and Shauman, 2003, 75). Furthermore, there is as belief explaining that women are more interested in the issues that aim at giving back to the society (Moss, Dovidio, Brescoll, Graham, and Handelsman, 2012, 16476). In short, they pursue in those subjects that strengthen their socialization aspects in the community. The STEMM subjects do not seem to attract any form of societal benefits, and the participants tend to work to reap benefits for their own. From the society point of view, STEMM subjects do not seem to have any connection with the needs of the community thereby acting as the hindrance upon which girls dislike the spatial issues. Topics such as environmental engineering are seen to have some beneficial aspects to the society, and it is true that many ladies do participate because of the socialization perspective in the community (Ong, Wright, Espinosa and Orfield, 2011, 180). Environmental bias serves a great role in convincing the women to leave the STEMM positions. In the workplaces where these subjects are manifested, women are treated differently from the men regarding payment and increment of other incentives. Also, the women start experiencing the sense of isolation because they are left out when certain jobs are executed. Due to that fact, many women are seen to opt the other way and participate in other careers where the workability is almost the same. Researchers also indicate that for a lady to be absorbed in the stem careers, she must produce more supportive academic documents than the males. This implies that even the employers contribute heavily to the gender bias since a woman is always seen to be less productive than their peers. That kind of a feeling significantly discourages other women willing to exercise their spatial skills and instead divert to other subjects in an attempt to retaliate from the gender bias. In the academic setting, students raise discussion concerning their teachers and lecturer on their teaching capabilities (Dweck, 2007, 56). The act of judging by the students that a man can properly teach a given subject more than a woman leads to the misunderstanding of the grievance by the girls and they do not wish ever participate in such criticized items. In several cases also, the interviewers or the employers are not convinced by the accomplishment results of the women, and they have little faith in them to have pursued in subjects such as medicine. This leads to the forming of the notion that a particular female participant might have used a back door to achieve such recommendations. Conclusively, factors that lead to under presentation of women in the STEMM subject based careers have significantly been highlighted. Most of the factors emanate from self-confidence and gender bias. It is, therefore, important for ladies to trust in their capabilities so as achieve the best in their STEMM careers. The society also has the mandate to ensure that women and men are treated the same without bias. References Hill, C., Corbett, C. and St Rose, A., 2010.Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Clark Blickenstaff*, J., 2005. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?.Gender and education,17(4), pp.369-386. Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M. and Barnett, S.M., 2009. Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations.Psychological bulletin,135(2), p.218. Stout, J.G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M. and McManus, M.A., 2011. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).Journal of personality and social psychology,100(2), p.255. Beede, D.N., Julian, T.A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B. and Doms, M.E., 2011. Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Moss-Racusin, C.A., Dovidio, J.F., Brescoll, V.L., Graham, M.J. and Handelsman, J., 2012. Science facultys subtle gender biases favor male students.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,109(41), pp.16474-16479. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. and Orfield, G., 2011. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.Harvard Educational Review,81(2), pp.172-209. Dweck, C.S., 2007.Is Math a Gift? Beliefs That Put Females at Risk. American Psychological Association. Hyde, J.S., Lindberg, S.M., Linn, M.C., Ellis, A.B. and Williams, C.C., 2008. Gender similarities characterize math performance.Science,321(5888), pp.494-495. Ceci, S.J. and Williams, W.M., 2011. Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,108(8), pp.3157-3162. Xie, Y., Shauman, K.A. and Shauman, K.A., 2003.Women in science: Career processes and outcomes(Vol. 26, No. 73.4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hewlett, S.A., Luce, C.B., Servon, L.J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E. and Sumberg, K., 2008. The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology.Harvard Business Review Research Report,10094.